WIKIPEDIA PAGE PROVEN BY TIME
We are a collegium of fifteen professional Wikipedia editors, servicing renowned world brands and influential figures since 2015. In an age of disposable, machine-written content, every article we produce is researched and written by hand - neutral, sourced, done confidently and correctly, with a real editor behind it. Send us your case, and we'll give you a candid assessment within a day. Our work is transparent, with proper disclosures, and follows Wikipedia community guidelines.
100% confidential · 24-hour response · all major wikipedia languages · professionals with 12 years in business
Wikipedia is the single most important source of entity information on Google and Gen AI search
Whether they type it into Google or ask an AI assistant who you or your company are, the answer traces back to the same place. Search shows the panel on the right that most people read instead of clicking through. And the AI models people now rely on are trained on Wikipedia, so its version of you or your brand becomes the one people repeat, stated as fact, with no link and no right of reply. For a founder, a researcher or a company, that one short paragraph quietly outweighs everything you've built - your site, your press, your story. And you don't own a word of it.
Short-lived Wikipedia pages come and go easily.
Successful pages require true talent and experience.
Successful pages require true talent and experience.
What decides the success of your page
Worldwide encyclopedias.
one unified approach.
one unified approach.
The author.
The sources.
The tone.
The moment editors sense a subject writing about themselves or paying someone undisclosed to do it, the article is read as a conflict of interest and results in being tagged or removed. On Wikipedia, who writes it counts as much as what it says.
One superlative can flag an entire article as promotion. Encyclopedic writing is plainer, drier and more careful than almost anyone expects going in.
Why doing it yourself is a bad idea
AI can draft an article in seconds, so it's worth asking whether you still need help. You do. The machine is weakest at exactly the things Wikipedia judges you on. Doing this with AI doesn't beat the three traps. It walks straight into them: promotional tone, weak sourcing, and machine-written text that editors now remove on sight. What makes a page fast is the same thing that gets it deleted. Knowing which sources hold and which words don't is craft - and that's the service.
Why doing it yourself is a bad idea
AI can draft an article in seconds, so it's worth asking whether you still need help. You do. The machine is weakest at exactly the things Wikipedia judges you on. Doing this with AI doesn't beat the three traps. It walks straight into them: promotional tone, weak sourcing, and machine-written text that editors now remove on sight. What makes a page fast is the same thing that gets it deleted. Knowing which sources hold and which words don't is craft - and that's the service.
Your website, your LinkedIn, a sponsored interview, a press release - none of it carries weight. The encyclopedia is built on independent reporting, and it cares far more about the quality of a source than the number of mentions.
A reputation rarely stops at a border, so we don't either. Wikipedia runs in hundreds of language editions, and we work across them under one consistent standard. Each has its own bar for notability, its own sources and its own community of editors. We approach every one of them the same careful way. For anyone operating internationally, that's the difference between being read correctly in one country and everywhere you do business.
Where we draw the line
- We won't ever expose who you are or that you worked with us.
We will keep every engagement strictly confidential, start to finish. - We won't make empty hasty promises.
We will assess every project with expert analysis before we commit. - We won't simply create whatever you ask for.
We will push back when an idea would hurt you, and do what's right for you and your business.
What we take on
- New article creationA fully researched, independently written entry, built to the standard the review process applies and filed through Wikipedia's official channel.
- Article updatesCorrections, expansions and current facts brought to an existing page, handled under the conflict-of-interest rules.
- Monitoring & protectionWe watch the page after publication and step in editorially when someone adds vandalism or error.
Every project opens with expert assessment.
The final figure follows from what the work actually requires.
Who you're actually working with
WikiQuill is a small, devoted collegium of professional editors - the Wikipedia practice of Quillhouse Partners.
We've spent the better part of the last decade developing the encyclopedia across several language editions, watching Wikipedia shape and grow, and learning how to navigate within its perilous waters. The customer works directly with the editorial team: no content mill and no middle-men. We continue our volunteer work on Wikipedia while delivering the best value for your project.
We've spent the better part of the last decade developing the encyclopedia across several language editions, watching Wikipedia shape and grow, and learning how to navigate within its perilous waters. The customer works directly with the editorial team: no content mill and no middle-men. We continue our volunteer work on Wikipedia while delivering the best value for your project.
Discreet by default
We don't publish case studies, and we never will. No client is named, no logo appears, and nothing on this page points back to a real person or company. If we've worked together, no one hears it from us. That holds even when the job was nothing more than a quiet look at your sources.
Discreet by default
We don't publish case studies, and we never will. No client is named, no logo appears, and nothing on this page points back to a real person or company. If we've worked together, no one hears it from us. That holds even when the job was nothing more than a quiet look at your sources.
Your Questions Answered
No, and that's the honest place to start. Wikipedia sets a real bar for notability, and it varies by field. The free read tells you whether you clear it, or what's still missing if you don't. Our assessment step tells you wether you clear the threshold, or what's.
We don't put a number on it before we've seen your case, because the work genuinely varies. Once we've read it, you get a clear, fixed proposal - no moving parts.
Yes, as long as it's disclosed. Wikipedia permits paid editing when the relationship is declared, which is how we work. Openly, every time. Anything hidden is off the table.
Usually four to eight weeks from go-ahead to a live page, depending on how the sourcing comes together. The initial read takes a day.
We write to the standard the community applies, so most pages pass review cleanly. If editors raise a fair concern afterward, we answer it on the merits. What we never do is promise placement up front - that decision was never ours to sell.
Start with an honest evaluation
Tell us who you are and point us to your best coverage. Within a day you'll know where you stand, even if the answer is "not yet". No pressure, no obligation, and no one trying to talk you into a page you don't need. Only expert and serious work on our side.